What Dare I Think? The Challenge of Modern Science to Human Action & Belief

Harper & Brothers (1931)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What Dare I Think?: The Challenge of Modern Science to Human Action & Belief, Including the Henry La Barre, Jayne Foundation Lectures (Philadelphia) for 1931.Julian Huxley & Henry La Barre Jayne Foundation - 1931 - Chatto & Windus.
Embodied science: Recentering religion-and-science.Philip Hefner - 2010 - Zygon 45 (1):251-263.
The cognitive science of religion/atheism and its impact on Plantinga's reformed epistemology.Richard Jonathan Sagar - unknown
John Macmurray's Philosophy of Science, Religion, and the Person.John Lawrence Daly - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of Chicago
Science and Religion: 5 Questions.Gregg D. Caruso (ed.) - 2014 - Automatic Press/VIP.
Does cognitive science show belief in god to be irrational? The epistemic consequences of the cognitive science of religion.Joshua C. Thurow - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):77-98.
Are science and religion natural enemies?Peter G. Woolcock - 2012 - The Australian Humanist 108 (108):1.
Whitehead on Religion and Science.Yih-Hsien Yu - 2008 - Philosophy and Culture 35 (6):57-72.
The Reenchantment of Science: Postmodern Proposals.David Ray Griffin (ed.) - 1988 - State University of New York Press.
Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion.John Hedley Brooke & Ian Maclean (eds.) - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Science, Religion, and the Meaning of Life.Mark Vernon - 2007 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
The philosophy of biology.David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.) - 1973 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Religion is easy, but science is hard … understanding McCauley's thesis.James A. Van Slyke - 2014 - Zygon 49 (3):696-707.
Science and Divine Action.Nancey Murphy - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 732--739.
Beyond conflict and reduction: between philosophy, science, and religion.William Desmond, John Steffen & Koen Decoster (eds.) - 2001 - Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-03

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references