Intellectual property and industrialization: legalizing hope in economic growth

Theory and Society 46 (1):57-93 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article draws on theoretical resources from economic sociology and sociology of law to intervene in economic debates about the relationship between intellectual property and industrialization. Utilizing historical evidence from the earliest period of American intellectual property law and from a formative company in the New England textile industry, I propose a social process of influence that connects intellectual property law to industrialization. I argue that, consistent with the findings of New Economic Sociology, social relationship structures and social capital are the proximate influential force in industrialization. However, I also argue that transformative changes in those social relationship structures are rooted in the emergence of a particular type of political culture: what I call here, borrowing from Hannah Arendt and Frank Dobbin, a “Natal-Industrial Culture.” A Natal-Industrial Culture, as I propose it here, is a political culture in which collective hopes for the future are placed in new technologies and new cultural products, as means for achieving economic growth. Intellectual property law contributed to the emergence of this new type of political culture by holding out the promise of property, as a reward for the provision of new technologies or new cultural products. Because of the way that hope works on motivation—through cognitive pre-rehearsals of future attainment, which involve semantically-meaningful propositions and contribute to positive emotional experience—the promise of property provided a powerful stimulant to social capital formation. Working through the semantic resonances of property, intellectual property law contributed to a political culture in which invention and creativity were expected to secure a future of growth within the political community, both for particular members and for the political community, as a whole. By fostering a Natal-Industrial Culture, intellectual property law contributed to systematic invention and social capital-formation, leading, in turn, to the transformative changes in working and material provisioning that constitute industrialization.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property.D. B. Resnik - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 46 (4):319-335.
Intellectual Property: Theory, Privilege, and Pragmatism.Dr Adam Moore - 2003 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 16 (2):191-216.
Intellectual Capital – new Object Regulated by Property Law?Asta Jakutytė-Sungailienė - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 117 (3):339-355.
Constructing Intellectual Property.Alexandra George - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
Labor as the Basis for Intellectual Property Rights.Bryan Cwik - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):681-695.
State and Property: Contradiction?Guo-fu Chen - 2004 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 6:76-84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-25

Downloads
12 (#1,084,326)

6 months
5 (#637,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Economy and Society.Max Weber - 2013 - Harvard University Press.
After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.
The life of the mind.Hannah Arendt - 1978 - New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Whose Justice? Which Rationality?Alasdair Macintyre - 1988 - Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (2):363-363.
Upheavals of Thought. The Intelligence of Emotions.Martha C. Nussbaum - 2003 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 65 (1):174-175.

View all 26 references / Add more references