A Report from the Field: Doing RRI from Scratch in an Assisted Living Technology Research and Development Project

In Fernando Ferri, Ned Dwyer, Saša Raicevich, Patrizia Grifoni, Husne Altiok, Hans Thor Andersen, Yiannis Laouris & Cecilia Silvestri (eds.), Governance and Sustainability of Responsible Research and Innovation Processes: Cases and Experiences. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 19-26 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The transdisciplinary Assisted Living project conducts research within, health science, social science and ethics. The overall aim of the project is to advance responsible research and innovation in the field of welfare technology. By adapting an RRI framework, the project aims to: map how stakeholders and experts perceive the state-of-the-art of responsible welfare technologies, focusing on assisted living technologies, in Norway and internationally; develop ALT solutions for users with mild cognitive impairment and dementia, through an RRI approach; judge by an integrated HTA approach whether technologies introduced through an RRI process score better than currently implemented technologies; and d) create a wider dialogue on responsible welfare technologies for the future, reflecting on alternatives and options. In the project RRI is operationalized as involving four dimensions: A specific focus on addressing significant societal needs and challenges, A research and development process that actively engages and responds to a range of stakeholders, A concerted effort to anticipate potential problems, identify alternatives, and reflect on underlying values, and A willingness from relevant actors to act and adapt according to 1–3. These dimensions are built into the project’s design in different ways. The project, funded by the Research Council of Norway, started December 2015 and we have by now had substantial experience with working with these dimensions in practice. This paper will describe the experiences with including needs assessment, engagement, anticipation, reflection and responsiveness in the project, after 1.5 years operation. The paper will highlight several challenges that have appeared in the project when doing RRI in practice, related to transdisciplinarity, communication, project planning and control, and quality. We believe that the challenges experienced in our project are typical of RRI projects, so it is important to create open discussions about the pros and cons of RRI projects in the community of RRI practitioners.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Assisted Reproduction - Islamic Views On The Science Of Procreation.Norhayati Ahmad - 2003 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 13 (2):59-60.
Healthcare Ethics in Finland: A Follow-up.Pekka Louhiala & Tuija Takala - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (3):236-240.
Esperienza religiosa e verita.Manuela Mihoci - 2005 - Cultura 2 (2):111-128.
Steps in the Analysis of Synthetic Biology.Gregory E. Kaebnick - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (4):2-2.
Unix: Building a Development Environment from Scratch.Warren Toomey - 2018 - In Giuseppe Primiero & Liesbeth De Mol (eds.), Reflections on Programming Systems: Historical and Philosophical Aspects. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 215-231.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-12

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references