Individuality in Fiction and the Creative Role of the Reader

Revue Internationale de Philosophie 262 (4):539-560 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The main aim of the paper is to offer a solution compatible with Graham Priest’s Noneism and Amie Thomasson’s Artifactual theory which stresses the epistemic features of the notion of individuality in fiction in a framework where individuals are conceived of as functions (the framework is known as the world-lines-semantics of Hintikka). According to our view, it is the endorsement of a reader’s perspective that extends the range of the values of the functions (individuals) and that offers an alternative solution to cases of identity inside and outside the scope of a fictionality (or representation) operator. More technically, this proposal can be seen as both extending the notion of individuality of the Artifactual theory and furnishing an epistemic twist to Priest’s principle of freedom.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-01

Downloads
50 (#316,816)

6 months
15 (#164,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Shahid Rahman
Université Charles-de-Gaulle - Lille 3
Matthieu Fontaine
Universidade de Lisboa

References found in this work

On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.
Fiction and Metaphysics.Amie Thomasson - 1999 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):190-192.
Speaking of fictional characters.Amie L. Thomasson - 2003 - Dialectica 57 (2):205–223.
The logic of existence.Henry S. Leonard - 1956 - Philosophical Studies 7 (4):49 - 64.

View all 12 references / Add more references