Encountering Finitude, Confronting Infinitude: Leo Tolstoy, Emmanuel Levinas, and the Ethics of Non-Resistance

Studies in Christian Ethics 33 (3):318-335 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article follows a strand of ethical thought that weaves itself throughout Leo Tolstoy’s religious writings: the injunction of non-resistance. This ethical position has been described by some critics as a form of religious idolatry in Tolstoy’s work. I challenge that claim in this article by deploying the work of Emmanuel Levinas to provide much needed nuance to Tolstoy’s call for non-resistance. Via the ethical framework provided by Levinas, I contend that Tolstoy’s positions are built upon a conception of the finite world that sees a proper comportment to finitude as the mode by which one engages the infinite. This ethical call is one that escapes satiation by demanding a ceaseless act of non-resistance—which is, for him, the essential kernel of the Christian message. Tolstoy’s God, I argue, is this infinite demand; something akin to an ethical claim that marks the subject—a mandate that is met when one enacts the ethical obligation of non-resistance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Spinoza and Tolstoy in Valentin Asmus’ comparative analysis.Svetlana Klimova - 2021 - Studies in East European Thought 74 (3):345-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-27

Downloads
17 (#864,680)

6 months
6 (#701,126)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ethics and Ontology.Jean Greisch - 1987 - Irish Philosophical Journal 4 (1-2):64-75.
Ethics and Ontology.Jean Greisch - 1987 - Irish Philosophical Journal 4 (1-2):64-75.

Add more references