Adorno and Schelling: How to ‘Turn Philosophical Thought Towards the Non-Identical’

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (6):1167-1179 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between Adorno and Schelling. It argues that Adorno resorted to Schellingian motifs to counteract the influence of Hegelian thought. In defending this thesis, I examine the various stages in the development of Adorno’s thought, beginning with two texts from the 1930s and concluding with Negative Dialectics and ‘Skoteinos’. This allows us to see that Adorno’s concern to discover a way of thinking that is capable of doing justice to the ‘non-identical’ was present throughout his philosophical career

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-11

Downloads
45 (#353,299)

6 months
1 (#1,471,470)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Franck Fischbach
Strasbourg University

Citations of this work

Bridging Thought’s Gaps. [REVIEW]Roderick Howlett - 2019 - Radical Philosophy Review 22 (2):315-319.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Elements of the philosophy of right.Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel - 1991 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Allen W. Wood & Hugh Barr Nisbet.
The Actuality of Philosophy.Theodor W. Adorno - 1977 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1977 (31):120-133.
The Idea of Natural History.T. W. Adorno - 1984 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1984 (60):111-124.
The actuality of philosophy.Theodor W. Adorno - 2000 - In O., Connor & B. (eds.), Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary. Blackwell. pp. 120-133.

View all 6 references / Add more references