Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):334-335 (2004)
AbstractThe “straw man” prior expectation of the dominant social psychology paradigm is that humans should behave with perfect rationality and high ethical standards. The more modest claim of evolutionary psychologists is that humans have evolved specific adaptations for adaptive problems that were reliably present in the ancestral environment. Outside that restricted range of problems, one should not expect optimal behavior.
Similar books and articles
Adaptationism and adaptive thinking in evolutionary psychology.Matthew Rellihan - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (2):245-277.
Standing Upright: The Moral and Legal Standing of Humans and Other Apes.Adam Kolber - 2002 - Stanford Law Review 54:163-204.
I. Apes and angels: Reductionism, selection, and emergence in the study of man.Eileen Barker - 1976 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 19 (1-4):367-387.
The historical turn in the study of adaptation.Paul E. Griffiths - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):511-532.
Natural selection doesn't work that way: Jerry Fodor vs. evolutionary psychology on gradualism and saltationism.Andre Ariew - 2003 - Mind and Language 18 (5):478-483.
Strong versus weak adaptationism in cognition and language.Scott Atran - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York: Oxford University Press New York.
Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans.Richard W. Byrne & Andrew Whiten (eds.) - 1988 - Oxford University Press.
Modest adaptationism: Muddling through cognition and language.Scott Atran - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):504-506.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads