Reply to Zach Weber

Australasian Philosophical Review 4 (2):178-182 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Bjørdal.Zach Weber - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):109-113.
Reply to Bjørdal.Zach Weber - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):109-113.
Paradoxes and Inconsistent Mathematics.Zach Weber - 2021 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
How Not to Save Searle: A Reply to Weber’s Reply.R. D'Amico & W. Butchard - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):445-448.
Naive Validity.Zach Weber - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (254):99-114.
Notes on inconsistent set theory.Zach Weber - 2013 - In Francesco Berto, Edwin Mares, Koji Tanaka & Francesco Paoli (eds.), Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications. Springer. pp. 315--328.
Jc Beall: Spandrels of Truth.Zach Weber - 2010 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (2).
With or Without Mechanisms: A Reply to Weber.Daniel Steel - 2007 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (3):360-365.
Reply to Crispin Wright and Richard Zach.Ian Rumfitt - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (8):2091-2103.
Front Matter.Zach Weber, Maarten McKubre-Jordens & Patrick Girard - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Logic 14 (1).
Lloyd Humberstone , The Connectives . Reviewed by.Zach Weber - 2013 - Philosophy in Review 33 (4):305-307.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-10

Downloads
12 (#1,085,484)

6 months
3 (#976,558)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The power of naive truth.Hartry Field - 2022 - Review of Symbolic Logic 15 (1):225-258.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references