Synthese (3-4):1-25 (2021)

Authors
Rasmus Jaksland
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Jan Faye
University of Copenhagen
Abstract
The last decade has seen an increasing number of references to quantum mechanics in the humanities and social sciences. This development has in particular been driven by Karen Barad’s agential realism: a theoretical framework that, based on Niels Bohr’s interpretation of quantum mechanics, aims to inform social theorizing. In dealing with notions such as agency, power, and embodiment as well as the relation between the material and the discursive level, the influence of agential realism in fields such as feminist science studies and posthumanism has been profound. However, no one has hitherto paused to assess agential realism’s proclaimed quantum mechanical origin including its relation to the writings of Niels Bohr. This is the task taken up here. We find that many of the implications that agential realism allegedly derives from a Bohrian interpretation of quantum mechanics dissent from Bohr’s own views and are in conflict with those of other interpretations of quantum mechanics. Agential realism is at best consistent with quantum mechanics and consequently, it does not capture what quantum mechanics in any strict sense implies for social science or any other domain of inquiry. Agential realism may be interesting and thought provoking from the perspective of social theorizing, but it is neither sanctioned by quantum mechanics nor by Bohr’s authority. This conclusion not only holds for agential realism in particular, it also serves as a general warning against the other attempts to use quantum mechanics in social theorizing.
Keywords Barad  Bohr  Agent realism  Complementarity  Quantum mechanics
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2021
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-021-03160-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How the Laws of Physics Lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 61 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Niels Bohr’s Generalization of Classical Mechanics.Peter Bokulich - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (3):347-371.
Quantum Mechanics and Realism.Peter Kosso - 2000 - Foundations of Science 5 (1):47-60.
Knowledge and Description: Bohr's Epistemology.John T. Sanders - 1998 - In Jan Such & Malgorzata Szczesniak (eds.), Z epistemologii wiedzy naukowej. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii.
On the Received Realist View of Quantum Mechanics.Nahuel Sznajderhaus - 2016 - Cadernos de História E Filosofia da Ciéncia.
Bohr, Einstein and Realism.Wojciech Daniel - 1989 - Dialectica 43 (3):249-261.
Realism About the Wave Function.Eddy Keming Chen - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (7).
Philosophen in der Mikrowelt — Ratlos?Manfred Stöckler - 1986 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 17 (1):68-95.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-04-18

Total views
17 ( #632,722 of 2,498,142 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #171,347 of 2,498,142 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes