Gravitational redshift, inertia, and the role of charge

Abstract

I argue that the gravitational redshift effect cannot be explained purely by way of uniformly accelerated frames, as sometimes suggested in the literature. This is due to the fact that in terms of physical effects a uniformly accelerated frame is not exactly equivalent to a homogeneous gravitational field let alone to a gravitational field of a point mass. In other words, the equivalence principle only holds in the regime of certain approximations. The concepts in need of clarification are spacetime curvature, inertia, and the weak equivalence principle with respect to our understanding of gravitational redshift. Furthermore, I briefly discuss gravitational redshift effects due to charge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Electric Field in a Gravitational Field.Amos Harpaz - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (4-5):763-772.
The Nonlinear Essence of Gravitational Waves.R. Aldrovandi, J. G. Pereira & K. H. Vu - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (10):1503-1517.
Gravity, Inertia, and Quantum Vacuum Zero Point Fields.James F. Woodward - 2001 - Foundations of Physics 31 (5):819-835.
Inertial reference frame system.Wilfred Krause - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (1):61-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-07

Downloads
6 (#1,454,046)

6 months
2 (#1,192,610)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Johannes Fankhauser
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations