Hermann Cappelen and Josh Dever, The Inessential Indexical: On the Philosophical Insignificance of Perspective and the First Person: Oxford University Press, 2013. Xiii + 194 pages ISBN 978-0-19-968674-2 [Book Review]

Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 32 (3):425-430 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s40961-015-0028-4

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Hermann Cappelen and Josh Dever, The Inessential Indexical: On the Philosophical Insignificance of Perspective and the First Person.Arthur Falk - 2015 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 32 (3):425-430.
The Inessential Indexical: On the Philosophical Insignificance of Perspective and the First Person, by Herman Cappelen and Josh Dever.Wolfram Hinzen - 2015 - Mind 124 (495):898-904.
The Inessential Indexical: On the Philosophical Insignificance of Perspective and the First Person By Herman Cappelen and Josh Dever. [REVIEW]Philip Atkins - 2016 - Analysis 76 (1):99-102.
The Inessential Indexical: On the Philosophical Insignificance of Perspective and the First Person.Herman Cappelen & Josh Dever - 2013 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Edited by Josh Dever.
The Cowherds, Moonpaths: Ethics and Emptiness: Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016, Xi + 274 pp, ISBN 978-0-19-02605-1-4.David Burton - 2016 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 33 (3):519-522.
The Inessential Indexical: On the Philosophical Insignificance of Perspective and the First Person.Jonathan Knowles - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (266):186-189.
Timothy Childers. Philosophy and Probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. ISBN: 978-0-19-966182-4 ; 978-0-19-966183-1 . Pp. xviii + 194. [REVIEW]Donald Gillies - 2014 - Philosophia Mathematica 22 (3):413-417.
Review of Timothy Childers. Philosophy and Probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. ISBN: 978-0-19-966182-4 ; 978-0-19-966183-1 . Pp. xviii + 194. [REVIEW]Donald Gillies - 2014 - Philosophia Mathematica 22 (3):413-417.
Timothy Childers. Philosophy and Probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. ISBN: 978-0-19-966182-4 (hbk); 978-0-19-966183-1 (pbk). Pp. xviii + 194. [REVIEW]Donald Gillies - 2014 - Philosophia Mathematica 22 (3):413-417.
Yes, essential indexicals really are essential.José Luis Bermúdez - 2017 - Analysis 77 (4):690-694.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-03

Downloads
8 (#1,335,087)

6 months
8 (#505,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Demystifying the myth. Perry: Revisiting the essential indexical.Ponte María de - 2022 - Belgrade Philosophical Annual 35 (2):107-127.
Bringing transparency to the de se debates.Ekain Garmendia Mujika - forthcoming - Philosophical Explorations:1-18.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Attitudes de dicto and de se.David Lewis - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (4):513-543.
On sense and reference.Gottlob Frege - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing about language. New York: Routledge. pp. 36--56.

Add more references