Philosophy of Environmental Law and Diverge Effects

Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 9 (35):107-117 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Environmental law is a complex interlocking body of statutes, common law, treaties, conventions, regulations and policies which operate to regulate the interaction of humanity and the natural environment. And the philosophy of law is concerned with providing a general philosophical analysis of law and legal institutions. In the philosophy of law, two discussions may be more important. One is the basis of law and the other, its goals. So on one hand, there is a disagreement between scholars of law on whether the basis of law is revelation, reason or experience, and on the other hand, on whether the aim of law is individual-based or society-based or a synthesis of these two. Such a disagreement can practically cause different effects. Consequently, the contrasting effects can be seen in the philosophy of environmental law as well. Here, in theists’ view, protection of environmental law is due to the motivation of fulfilling a religious obligation, whereas in materialists’ opinion it is motivated by profiteering. Thus, a fundamental work prior to any discussions on the complex issues of environmental law is debate on the philosophy of environmental law and its dualistic effects, which the present paper attempts to deal with.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Environmental regulation.Cary Coglianese & Catherine Courcy - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of empirical legal research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Environmental Law and Economics.Bruce R. Huber & Klaus Mathis (eds.) - 2017 - Cham: Imprint: Springer.
Origins of Environmental Regulation.Aurelija Pūraitė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (2):657-674.
Law.Sheila Jasanoff - 1991 - In Dale Jamieson (ed.), A Companion to Environmental Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 331–346.
Beyond zero-sum environmentalism.Sarah Powers Krakoff, Melissa Ann Powers & Jonathan D. Rosenbloom (eds.) - 2019 - Washington, D.C.: Environmental Law Institute.
Znaczenie prawa ochrony środowiska.Leszek Karski - 2011 - Studia Ecologiae Et Bioethicae 9 (1).
Law, Reason, Will.R. D. Lumb - 1960 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 10 (10):179-189.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-24

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references