The Totality, the Individual, and Their Relation: A Study of the Nature of Reality and the Significance of Life

Abstract

Life is challenging. Philosophy is, among other things, a response to the challenges of life. Among the methods of philosophy is rational reflection on the nature of reality and the significance of life. This conceptual aspect of philosophy is very powerful, but it has its limitations. If correctly interpreted, it can be a great indicator of the way; if wrongly appreciated, it can be an obstacle to understanding. Concepts can reveal but they can also conceal. In particular, concepts can generate a mistaken view of the nature of the finite individual, a view in which the finite individual is supposed to be self-contained and independently real. In truth, supposed finite individuals are without concrete boundaries, and are dependent upon a larger reality. The Totality is the whole of this larger interdependent reality. The Totality is not a simple unity, but rather, an extended order of dependence. This order of dependence is the basis for the directionality of time and the openness of the future. Each moment is eternal, neither arising nor ceasing. Even so, since the earlier is independent of the later, the future, which is just the later relative to any moment, is not strictly determined. This means that creation is in a sense ongoing, and we all play a role in the making of reality. In recognizing the deep interconnectivity of reality, one sees one's ultimate non-difference from supposed others. Concern for others then arises spontaneously. This is the ultimate ground of ethics. Through recognizing and acting upon this truth, our deepest fulfillment and happiness is achieved

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Ignacio Ellacuría’s Philosophy of Historical Reality.Manuel Mejido C. - 2006 - Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):287-318.
The difference totality makes. Reconsidering Pannenberg's eschatological ontology.Dr Benjamin Myers - 2007 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 49 (2).
The difference totality makes: Reconsidering Pannenberg's eschatological ontology.Benjamin Myers - 2007 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 49 (2):141-155.
Ignacio Ellacuría’s Philosophy of Historical Reality.C. Manuel Mejido - 2006 - Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):287-318.
Reality and Philosophy: Reflections on Cora Diamond's Work.Leonard Lawlor - 2011 - Philosophical Investigations 34 (4):353-366.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-04

Downloads
20 (#764,377)

6 months
3 (#965,065)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (23):829-839.
The Insignificance of Individuals.John Lachs - 2002 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 38 (1/2):79 - 93.

Add more references