Philosophical Studies 172 (4):969-986 (2015)

Thomas A. C. Reydon
Universität Hannover
Richard Boyd’s Homeostatic Property Cluster Theory is becoming the received view of natural kinds in the philosophy of science. However, a problem with HPC Theory is that it neglects many kinds highlighted by scientific classifications while at the same time endorsing kinds rejected by science. In other words, there is a mismatch between HPC kinds and the kinds of science. An adequate account of natural kinds should accurately track the classifications of successful science. We offer an alternative account of natural kinds that better recognizes the diversity of epistemic aims scientists have for constructing classifications. That account introduces the idea of a classificatory program and provides criteria for judging whether a classificatory program identifies natural kinds.
Keywords Natural kinds  Classification  Homeostatic property clusters  Richard Boyd  Scientific kinds  Classificatory programs
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-014-0301-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,192
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge University Press.
Philosophy of Biology.Elliott Sober - 1993 - Westview Press.

View all 52 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Social Ontology.Brian Epstein - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Natural Kinds.Emma Tobin & Alexander Bird - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 59 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Do the Life Sciences Need Natural Kinds?Thomas A. Reydon - 2009 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):167-190.
On the Necessity of Natural Kinds.John Collier - 1996 - In P. Riggs (ed.), Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 1-10.
The Natural Shiftiness of Natural Kinds.Ronald de Sousa - 1984 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (4):561 - 580.
Emergence Unscathed: Kim on Non-Reducible Types.Ron McClamrock - 1993 - Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy 3.
A Multiple Realization Thesis for Natural Kinds.Kevin Lynch - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):389-406.
Interactive Kinds.Muhammad Ali Khalidi - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):335-360.
Scientific Understanding and Colorful Quarks.Antigone M. Nounou - 2010 - Archives International d'Histoire des Sciences 60 (164):155-171.


Added to PP index

Total views
225 ( #50,110 of 2,507,504 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #47,385 of 2,507,504 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes