Review of Havelock Ellis: Studies in the Psychology of Sex. Vol. II, Sexual Inversion [Book Review]

International Journal of Ethics 27 (1):114-115 (1916)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/intejethi.27.1.2376964

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Studies in the Psychology of Sex, Vol. I. Sexual Inversion.Havelock Ellis - 1898 - The Monist 8:471.
Studies in the psychology of the sex. vol. I, Sexual inversion.Havelock Ellis - 1898 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 46:200-202.
Book Review:Studies in the Psychology of Sex. Vol. II, Sexual Inversion. Havelock Ellis. [REVIEW]F. W. Stella Browne - 1916 - International Journal of Ethics 27 (1):114-.
Studies in the Psychology of Sex. Vol. I., Sexual Inversion.Havelock Ellis & Edward Carpenter - 1899 - International Journal of Ethics 9 (2):261-262.
Book Review:Studies in the Psychology of Sex. Vol. I., Sexual Inversion. Havelock Ellis; An Unknown People. Edward Carpenter. [REVIEW]S. H. - 1899 - International Journal of Ethics 9 (2):261-.
Studies in the Psychology of Sex.Havelock Ellis - 2015 - Palala Press.
Studies in the Psychology of Sex.Havelock Ellis - 1904 - The Monist 14:480.
Studies in the psychology of sex. Vol. I., Sexual inversion.No Authorship Indicated - 1898 - Psychological Review 5 (3):341-341.
ELLIS, H. -Sexual Inversion.W. H. S. Monck - 1882 - Mind 7:427.
ELLIS, H. -Sexual Inversion.H. Barker - 1898 - Mind 7:427.
Response: Commentary “The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis revisited: Valid indicator of sexual objectification or methodological artifact?”.Alexander F. Schmidt - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Spectrum inversion without a difference in representation is impossible.Jeff Speaks - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (3):339-361.
Commentary “The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis revisited: Valid indicator of sexual objectification or methodological artifact?”.Philippe Bernard, Sarah J. Gervais, Jill Allen & Olivier Klein - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Havelock Ellis on Criminology, Sexology, and Moral Philosophy: Reconciling Mysticism and Science in Victorian England.Marcia Ann Hawkins - 2000 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Arlington
Sexual desire, not hypersexuality, is related to neurophysiological responses elicited by sexual images.Vaughn R. Steele & Staley - 2013 - Socioaffective Neuroscience and Psychology 3.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
8 (#1,311,508)

6 months
1 (#1,463,894)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references