Cohabitation, marriage, and the unruly consequences of difference

Gender and Society 14 (1):87-110 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is based on interviews with a small number of cohabitants who are critical of conventional marriage. It examines some of the ways in which the distinction between heterosexual cohabitation and marriage is rendered in the New Zealand context. Culturally available distinctions, like that between cohabitation and marriage, are used in the production of resistant counterdiscourses. However, difference can be rewritten as deviance and in this form is central to the exercise of disciplinary power. Contextual shifts in the assertion of a cohabitational self and a marital self contribute to the blurring of the distinction, further exposing the dilemmas of resistance based on difference.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Judging in Marriage’s Shadow.Robert Leckey - 2018 - Feminist Legal Studies 26 (1):25-45.
Cohabitation Law Reform – Messages From Research.Anne Barlow - 2006 - Feminist Legal Studies 14 (2):167-180.
After Marriage: Rethinking Marital Relationships.Elizabeth Brake (ed.) - 2016 - , US: Oxford University Press USA.
Sexual Difference and Marriage.Daniel Avila - 2009 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 9 (3):441-446.
Why the Teleology of Marriage Matters to Law.Mark J. Boone - 2015 - The Evangelical Philosophical Society's Web Project for Philosophical Discussions of Marriage and Family Topics.
Temporary Marriage.Daniel Nolan - 2015 - In Elizabeth Brake (ed.), After Marriage: Rethinking Marital Relationships. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 180-203.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-27

Downloads
16 (#883,649)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?