The Golden Bough as the handmaiden of colonialism? A response to Mary Beard

Abstract

This paper responds to Mary Beard’s assessment of the claim that Frazer’s book The Golden Bough was popular because it provided practical aid for colonialists. Beard rejects this as an inadequate explanation: reference to colonialism is part of an adequate explanation, but a full explanation must go beyond this particular ism. I present two objections to the case she makes for her inadequacy conclusion, though I don’t think his book aided much with colonialism.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The golden bough.P. C. - 1901 - The Monist 11 (3):457 - 464.
America in Midpassage.Charles Beard & Mary Beard - 1939 - Ethics 50 (1):111-115.
The Rise of American Civilization.Charles A. Beard, Mary R. Beard & Vernon Louis Parrington - 1927 - International Journal of Ethics 38 (1):112-115.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-05

Downloads
209 (#95,576)

6 months
119 (#34,024)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references