Defining the Indefinable

Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 16:89-94 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Intrinsic and essential nature of Brahman, as Light luminous-in-self of Witness Consciousness requires a radically apophatic discourse. Brahman is Ātman, the inner Self, of all beings, is uniform, nondual, unchangeable, Ultimate Reality which cannot be objectified in any way, since It is the unseen seer, the unthinkable thinker, the unknown knower. The Upanishads require the unique method of excluding all empirical modes of teaching or knowledge about Brahman. And, this method shows Brahman revealed by itself, by simply removing the imaginary veil of wrong thinking, constructed by projecting limiting adjuncts of ignorance. Brahman, as the inner Self, needs no definition or evidence to be known. Really speaking, it is impossible for anyone „to define” in words or „to formulate” an idea about Brahman, for the simple reason that It is beyond to discursive thought. Brahman, Ultimate Reality, is non-dual light, pure Consciousness as intuitive experience, through which all human activities are performed. Just in this spectrum of non-dual experience, must be understood the negation neti, neti in Sankara`s thought: far from being a mere exercise of philosophical dexterity, via negativa has a practical application, experiential in knowledge of Ultimate Reality.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consciousness and Brahman-atman.Mark B. Woodhouse - 1978 - The Monist 61 (January):109-124.
Conclusions of Science.B. R. Shantha Kumari - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 8:147-153.
Consciousness and Brahman-Atman.Mark B. Woodhouse - 1978 - The Monist 61 (1):109-124.
Indian Philosophy: A Note on Some Characteristics.N. A. Nikam - 1953 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (4):665 - 678.
Schopenhauer’s Philosophy of Will and Sankara’s Advaita Vedanta.Arati Barua - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 8:23-29.
The Concept of Mukti in Advaita Vedanta. [REVIEW]K. J. - 1966 - Review of Metaphysics 20 (2):381-382.
Sankara's fatal mistake.L. Stafford Betty - 1994 - Asian Philosophy 4 (1):3 – 7.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-08

Downloads
6 (#1,462,063)

6 months
4 (#792,011)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ioan Dura
Ovidius University Of Constanta

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references