In Defence of the Baldwin Effect: A Reply to Watkins

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):477 - 479 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A recent paper by John Watkins argues that the Baldwin effect, a hypothetical evolutionary process by which a culturally evolved behavior might promote the evolution of a genetic basis for that behavior, is inconsistent with evolutionary theory. In this reply, I argue that in case the genetic basis of the behavior in question determines separable constituents of the behavior, Watkins's argument is unsound

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Defence of the Baldwin Effect: A Reply to Watkins.J. DuprÉ - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):477-479.
Discussion. In defence of the Baldwin effect: a reply to Watkins.John Dupré - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):477-479.
Organic Selection and Social Heredity: The Original Baldwin Effect Revisited.Nam Le - 2019 - Artificial Life Conference Proceedings 2019 (31):515-522.
The Baldwin effect and Genetic assimilation: Contrasting explanatory foci and Gene concepts in two approaches to an evolutionary process.Paul Griffiths - 2006 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Culture and Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 91-101.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
21 (#133,716)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Dupre
University of Exeter

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Note on Baldwin Effect.John Watkins - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (3):417 - 423.

Add more references