A sieve for entailments

Journal of Philosophical Logic 9 (1):41 - 57 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The validity of an entailment has nothing to do with whether or not the components are true, false, necessary, or impossible; it has to do solely with whether or not there is a necessary connection between antecedent and consequent. Hence it is a mistake (we feel) to try to build a sieve which will “strain out” entailments from the set of material or strict “implications” present in some system of truth-functions, or of truth-functions with modality. Anderson and Belnap (1962, p. 47)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Entailment and the Modal Fallacy.John Bacon - 1965 - Review of Metaphysics 18 (3):566 - 571.
Perfect validity, entailment and paraconsistency.Neil Tennant - 1984 - Studia Logica 43 (1-2):181 - 200.
First-Degree Entailment and Truthmaker Functions.Roderick Batchelor - 2024 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 53 (2):373-390.
A Question of Entailment.John O. Nelson - 1964 - Review of Metaphysics 18 (2):364 - 377.
Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity. [REVIEW]F. K. C. - 1976 - Review of Metaphysics 30 (2):335-337.
Conditionals: Truth, safety, and success.Hugh Mellor & Richard Bradley - 2020 - Mind and Language 37 (2):194-207.
Knowledge without Truth.Priyedarshi Jetli - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:97-103.
A Gentzen Calculus for Nothing but the Truth.Stefan Wintein & Reinhard Muskens - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (4):451-465.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
53 (#293,751)

6 months
7 (#592,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jon Michael Dunn
PhD: University of Pittsburgh; Last affiliation: Indiana University, Bloomington

Citations of this work

Variable-Sharing as Relevance.Shawn Standefer - forthcoming - In Andrew Tedder, Shawn Standefer & Igor Sedlar (eds.), New Directions in Relevant Logic. Springer.
Explicating Logical Independence.Lloyd Humberstone - 2020 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 49 (1):135-218.
Some Concerns Regarding Ternary-relation Semantics and Truth-theoretic Semantics in General.Ross T. Brady - 2017 - IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications 4 (3):755--781.
Relevant implication and the case for a weaker logic.Ross T. Brady - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (2):151 - 183.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

First-order logic.Raymond Merrill Smullyan - 1968 - New York [etc.]: Springer Verlag.
Entailment and Deducibility.T. J. Smiley - 1959 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 59:233-254.
The pure calculus of entailment.Alan Ross Anderson & Nuel D. Belnap - 1962 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 27 (1):19-52.
Meaning and Modality.Casimir Lewy - 1976 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references