Abstract

Shun Ming Yue TNA, No. entire Temple, Yangming in a critical theory that once the most power, such as heart attacks Elephant National Yang-Ming University for the Zen, concentric half insisted saying, I do not know that the intimate nature of Mind, but left the grounds on, that is, I do not know intimate Sekishi nature, this outline of his doctrine of the head, and this is certainly the work of Zhu Xi to nature and poor management on the theory, however, opposes Zhu Qi-half that recognized advocate to take management in the gas, turn the gas on the thinking of the precursor to the Ming Dynasty, but he still resolve to face the phenomenon of good and evil, therefore proposed a sub-Shu said that the solution, in essence is, still can not get rid of qi binary thinking. In short, TNA along the dialectic of Confucianism and Buddhism and Confucianism in order to reconstruct the internal as moral principles, is not conducive to the dialectic within the teachings of Confucianism and Buddhism Confucianism also cause disorders, but also do standing position to carry forward the Neo Zhu Xi school, there are also successful in Confucianism. Completes the qi concentric theory of Discriminate, is indeed a ontology into the path of thinking, therefore with the work on the route of Mind ideas very different, this paper is to basic question of philosophy of research into the way in an attempt to resolve the TNA Shun Qi concentric theory of ontological approaches significance. Luo-Gin Shun was one of the Neo-Confucianism at Ming dynastic. He strongly criticized the philosophy of Wang, Yang Ming and stand with Chu-Hsi. He divided the concept of mind and nature and thought that the Zen Buddhism and the philosophy of Wang, Yang Ming were both mistakenly taking the nature as the mind, therefore they lost the truth of the world and doing arbitrarily by their personal will. Since the nature deals with the universal principle and the mind held only on personal will. As for the universe, the principle should be recognized through the matter instead of been taking as an individual object. This is his idea that has been seen as different from Chu-Hsi. But he soon propose another idea that which says the principle is identical and the matter is diverse, for dealing with the problem of the diversity of the personality and the identity of the nature. This makes his theory of principle / matter has some thing the same and some what different from Chu-Hsi. The way Luo-Gin Shun doing his philosophical speculation is basically through the approach of ontology which means that for the purpose of arguing with Zen Buddhism he needs to suggest different metaphysical theory and through which to criticize some Confucian theories that are already confused themselves with the Zen Buddhism. Actually, the theory of Wang, Yang Ming is not talking about the metaphysics but the theory of practice that is why he should recognize the nature as the mind. Because one should cultivate himself by purify his mind to be unite to his nature. Anyway, Luo-Gin Shun made his contribution to recover the theory of Chu-Hsi at Ming dynasty but fail to the understanding of the philosophy of Wang, Yang Ming