Framing Ethical Concerns and Attitudes towards Human Gene Patents in the Chinese Press

Asian Bioethics Review 12 (3):307-323 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study examines the representations of human gene patents in Chinese newspapers. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of news articles published between 2006 and 2017 to identify the major themes in media coverage, ethical considerations, perceptions of risks and benefits, and attitudes towards the patentability of human genes. The results show that two key ethical concerns were expressed by journalists: that it is morally wrong to own or patent human genes and that gene patents could potentially impede patients’ access to healthcare services. Nonetheless, the press coverage has tended to be largely favorable, rather than opposed to human gene patenting. There were no normative claims that human genes should not be patentable in China, which indicates a generally positive attitude towards patentability in media discourse. Most articles that expressed criticism toward gene patenting discussed challenges in other countries, with significant attention given to the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in the Myriad case that invalidated Myriad Genetics’ patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Overall, the newspapers were uncritical of the Chinese gene patenting regime. News reporting on the issue was highly suggestive of a strong pro-commercialization stance, although some discussions emphasized potential risks over benefits. Our analysis highlights the need for balanced media reporting on human gene patents in China and a top-down approach to engage the public in substantive discussions on the ethical and societal implications of the existing patent regime.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics and the patenting of human genes.Annabelle Lever - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 1:31-46.
Human Gene Patents and the Question of Liberal Morality.Theo Papaioannou - 2008 - Genomics, Society and Policy 4 (3):1-19.
Gene Patents Can Be Ethical.Glenn Mcgee - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):417-421.
Gene patents.Kerri Anne Brussen - 2011 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 16 (3):9.
Human Gene Patents and Human Dignity.Stephanie H. To - 2015 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15 (2):265-285.
Embryonic Stem Cell Patents and Human Dignity.David B. Resnik - 2007 - Health Care Analysis 15 (3):211-222.
Introduction.Myles W. Jackson - 2015 - Perspectives on Science 23 (1):1-12.
A Chinese critique on Western ways of warfare.Kurtis Hagen - 1996 - Asian Philosophy 6 (3):207-217.
Human gene patents: Core issues in a multi-layered debate. [REVIEW]Rogeer Hoedemaekers - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):211-221.
Should Human Genes Be Patented?David K. Chan - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):30-36.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-02

Downloads
19 (#788,257)

6 months
15 (#161,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?