Grammar, Semantics and Conditionals

Analysis 50 (4):214 - 224 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Any semantic theory is bound to presume some structure in the messages it analyses, and the success of the theory depends on getting this structure right. But discovering this structure is the business of grammar. Therefore grammar is a necessary preliminary to semantics. Semantic theories of conditionals vividly illustrate this. All presume a provably untenable ternary structure: antecedent, operator, consequent. And all can be shown committed as a result to a thoroughly unbelievable set of connections between sentences and their informational burdens. Actually, a conditional has five immediate factors, none of them an antecedent or a consequent



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

115 (#156,038)

6 months
6 (#530,265)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Fatalism, bivalence and the past.Richard Gaskin - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (190):83-88.
Dudman and the plans of mice and men.Ross Cogan - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (190):88-95.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references