Laws, regularities and exceptions

Ratio 13 (1):1–12 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Sentences of the form ‘Fs are Gs’ can express laws of nature, weaker Special Science laws, and also regularities which are not a part of any explicit science. These so-called generic sentences express nomic relationships which may have exceptions. I discuss the kinds of regularities expressed by generic sentences and argue that since they play a similar role in determining our ability to categorise and reason about the world, we should look for a unified treatment of them

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Generics and defaults.Francis Jeffry Pelletier & Nicholas Asher - 1997 - In J. F. A. K. Van Benthem, Johan van Benthem & Alice G. B. Ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language. Elsevier.
Can bare dispositions explain categorical regularities?Tyler Hildebrand - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (3):569-584.
Stable regularities without governing laws?Aldo Filomeno - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 66:186-197.
Laws of Nature.Rom Harré - 2000 - In W. Newton-Smith (ed.), A companion to the philosophy of science. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. pp. 213–223.
Lossy laws.David Braddon-Mitchell - 2001 - Noûs 35 (2):260–277.
Generic Excluded Middle.James Ravi Kirkpatrick - forthcoming - Philosophers' Imprint.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
78 (#208,875)

6 months
13 (#276,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references