Can Arguments of Formal Naturalism be used to Show that the Mathematical Explanation is Indispensable in Science?

Filozofska Istrazivanja 36 (3):545-559 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mathematical arguments in context.Jean Paul Van Bendegem & Bart Van Kerkhove - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):45-57.
Mathematical Explanation in Science.Alan Baker - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):611-633.
Is Mathematics a Domain for Philosophers of Explanation?Erik Weber & Joachim Frans - 2017 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 48 (1):125-142.
Mathematical, astrological, and theological naturalism.J. M. Dieterle - 1999 - Philosophia Mathematica 7 (2):129-135.
Foot and Hare on naturalism.M. B. E. Smith - 1974 - Metaphilosophy 5 (3):187–197.
Indispensability, causation and explanation.Sorin Bangu - 2018 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 33 (2):219-232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-20

Downloads
22 (#692,982)

6 months
12 (#202,587)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Vladimir Drekalović
University of Montenegro

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references