Siris and the scope of Berkeley's instrumentalism

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3 (2):279 – 300 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I. Introduction Siris, Berkeley's last major work, is undeniably a rather odd book. It could hardly be otherwise, given Berkeley's aims in writing it, which are three-fold: 'to communicate to the public the salutary virtues of tar-water,'1 to provide scientific background supporting the efficacy of tar-water as a medicine, and to lead the mind of the reader, via gradual steps, toward contemplation of God.2 The latter two aims shape Berkeley's extensive use of contemporary natural science in Siris. In particular, Berkeley's focus on what he calls fire (or aether or light) as a quasiuniversal 'cause' of natural change3 serves these purposes, for the 'activity' of the aether, in his view, can both explain the miraculous virtues of a certain medicine, i.e. tar-water, and reveal God's action and his divine order.4 Berkeley's corpuscular speculations, including his use of fire-theory, are not especially idiosyncratic as natural philosophy. In his theorizing, as Jessop and other have noted, he is heavily indebted to the work of Hermann Boerhaave, the Dutch chemist, botanist, and physician whose teachings were highly influential in mid-eighteenth century Britain.5 Boerhaave, along with other Dutch natural philosophers cited by Berkeley, assigned a central role in accounting for physio-chemical activity to fire, a subtle, insensible particulate substance, sometimes identified with light.

Similar books and articles

Berkeley and bodily resurrection.Marc A. Hight - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):443-458.
The rhetoric of Berkeley's philosophy.Peter Walmsley - 1990 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Backgrounds of romanticism.Leonard M. Trawick - 1967 - Bloomington,: Indiana University Press.
George Berkeley: idealism and the man.David Berman - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Berkeley's case against realism about dynamics.Lisa Downing - 1995 - In Robert G. Muehlmann (ed.), Berkeley's Metaphysics: Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays. The Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 197--214.
Berkeley's natural philosophy and philosophy of science.Lisa Downing - 2005 - In Kenneth P. Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 230--265.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-01

Downloads
1,360 (#8,330)

6 months
73 (#65,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lisa Downing
Ohio State University

Citations of this work

Berkeley's natural philosophy and philosophy of science.Lisa Downing - 2005 - In Kenneth P. Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 230--265.
Berkeley and Proof in Geometry.Richard J. Brook - 2012 - Dialogue 51 (3):419-435.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea.Arthur O. Lovejoy - 1936 - Cambridge, Mass.,: Transaction Publishers.
Cognitive Theology and Emotive Mysteries in Berkeley's Alciphron.David Berman - 1981 - Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 81:219-229.
Locke, Berkeley, and Corpuscular Scepticism.Daniel Garber - 1982 - In Colin Murray Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays. University of Minnesota Press.
Berkeley and the essences of the corpuscularians.Margaret D. Wilson - 1985 - In John Foster & Howard Robinson (eds.), Essays on Berkeley: a tercentennial celebration. New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references