Confessions of an unrepentant timbral sonicist

British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):33-52 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Simplifying somewhat, sonicists believe that works of music are individuated purely in terms of how they sound. For them, exact sound-alikes are identical. Stephen Davies, in his ‘Musical Works and Orchestral Colour’ ( BJA 48 (2008), pp. 363–375) took me to task for defending a version of sonicism. In this paper I seek to explain why Davies's objections miss their mark. In the course of the discussion, I make some methodological remarks about the ontology of music

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-01-09

Downloads
156 (#118,047)

6 months
11 (#220,905)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julian Dodd
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

The philosophy of music.Andrew Kania - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
History of the Ontology of Art.Paisley Nathan Livingston - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Taste(s) of a Recipe.Davide Bordini - 2021 - In Andrea Borghini & Patrik Engisch (eds.), A Philosophy of Recipes: Making, Experiencing, and Valuing. Bloomsbury.
Spatial music.John Dyck - 2022 - European Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):279-292.
Brilliant Performances.Aaron Ridley - 2012 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 71:209-227.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references