Philosophy for Engineering: Practice, Context, Ethics, Models, Failure

Springer Singapore (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book highlights the unique need for philosophy among engineers, which stems from issues regarding their knowledge, role or being and influence. It discusses practice, context, ethics, models and failure as key aspects of engineering, and provides an easy but essential introduction to philosophy for engineers by presenting four key philosophers and linking them to these aspects: Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, Michael Polanyi and Martin Heidegger. Popper, Kuhn and Polanyi are philosophers of science who have challenged the view that science is a ‘cool, detached’ discipline, since it also depends on human imagination, consensus and judgment plus artistry ; factors that are central to engineering. Heidegger critiqued technology on the one hand, but also stressed the importance of ‘doing’ over ‘knowing,’ thus ‘authenticating’ the highly pragmatic engineering profession. Science is the ‘core’ component of engineering, which is overlaid by a variety of heuristics. Practice-based knowledge can be formalized, with artificial intelligence offering a valuable tool for engineering, just as mathematics has done for science. The book also examines systems thinking in engineering. Featuring numerous diagrams, tables and examples throughout, the book is easily accessible to engineers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Chapters

Conclusion: From Philosophy to Engineering

We draw together the ideas of Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, Michael Polanyi and Martin Heidegger that are relevant to engineering on practice, context, ethics, models and failure; and then identify some areas that have not been explored in depth, such as uncertainty, sensitivity, hierarchy, emergence an... see more

Can Practice Based Knowledge Be Formalized?

Michael Polanyi’s epistemology and Martin Heidegger’s ontology provide a strong rationale for the notion of practice based knowledge. Tacit knowing and pre-theoretical shared practice are two such philosophical concepts. Practice based knowledge can be categorized as being either historical or horiz... see more

Is Knowledge Acquired by Thinking or Doing?

Some aspects of Martin Heidegger’s philosophy resonate strongly with an engineering outlook. He argued that practice was more ‘primordial’ than theory, though preserving an important role for theoretical understanding as well, thus speaking to the gap between engineering education and engineering pr... see more

Is Technology Neutral?

Heidegger affirmed traditional technology, but was opposed to science based modern technology, in which everything including humans tend to get ‘levelled down’ to a mere ‘resource’. This opposition was expressed in the form of deep questioning and a suspicion of superficial evaluation, because the t... see more

Shared Values for Aesthetics and Ethics?

Michael Polanyi insisted that scientific knowledge was intensely personal in nature, though held with universal intent and hence shared. His insights regarding the personal values of beauty and morality in science are first enunciated and then explored for their relevance to engineering. It is shown... see more

Will Any Old Model Do?

Thomas Kuhn argued that science progressed from one ‘ruling paradigm’ to another through periods of ‘revolution’; and also that science was concerned not so much with truth, but with theories that explained phenomena. While most scientists would be uncomfortable with such a relativist and non-realis... see more

Are Failures the Pillars of Success?

Karl Popper argued that the scientific method was cyclic in nature; and that the growth of scientific knowledge took place when we focused on the falsification of theories, as opposed to their verification. We demonstrate here the relevance of these ideas to engineering processes and approaches, whi... see more

Are Engineers Makers or Thinkers?

Engineers could have an identity crisis arising from questions regarding their influence, role and knowledge. These questions relate to ethics, ontology and epistemology respectively, demonstrating that philosophy is highly relevant to engineering. The tensions, differences and similarities between ... see more

Introduction: From Engineering to Philosophy

We argue that practice, context, ethics, models and failure are crucial for engineering. There are many aspects to consider regarding these terms; and engineers should try to reflect on them thoughtfully. We then present Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, Michael Polanyi and Martin Heidegger as 20th century ... see more

Similar books and articles

Aesthetics and Ethics in Engineering: Insights from Polanyi. [REVIEW]Priyan Dias - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):233-243.
Heidegger’s resonance with engineering: The primacy of practice.W. P. S. Dias - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3):523-532.
Failure of Engineering Artifacts: A Life Cycle Approach.Luca Del Frate - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):913-944.
The Disciplines of Engineering and History: Some Common Ground.Priyan Dias - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):539-549.
The Responsibilities of Engineers.Justin Smith, Paolo Gardoni & Colleen Murphy - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):519-538.
Engineering Ethics.Christelle Didier - 2009 - In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 427-432.
Philosophy of technology and macro-ethics in engineering.Wha-Chul Son - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):405-415.
Virtue as the basis of engineering ethics.Douglas J. Crawford-Brown - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (4):481-489.
Is Structuralism Unavoidable in the Application of Ethics?Debashis Guha - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 3:31-38.
A Systematic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education.Jessica Li & Shengli Fu - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):339-349.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-03

Downloads
3 (#1,690,426)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references