Melons, watermelons and Large Elephant: A case against Composionality? Comments on Siebel

Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 15 (2):281-285 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Siebel's exposition of the Principle of Compositionality, the main argument against it and Fodor's reply and its virtues, is extremely clear, so I go direct to the problem. I'll make, first, some comments on ambiguity for I think that some aspects of the problem, and the persuasive part of Lahav's objections, have to do with it; then I'll focus on Siebel's worries about Fodor's reply, and I'll defend that an improved version of the Fodorian approach shows that such worries are unsound.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein's Elephant and Closet Tortoise.Brian Grant - 1995 - Philosophy 70 (272):191 - 215.
Kantian Themes in The Elephant Man.Christopher Grau - 2015 - Film and Philosophy 19:164-173.
Contra Watermelons.Walter Block - 2009 - Ethics, Place and Environment 12 (3):305-308.
cv where Vv i∈.Elephant Bird, Ameba Shark, Bird Rational & Elephant Rational - 2006 - In Paolo Valore (ed.), Topics on General and Formal Ontology. Polimetrica International Scientific Publisher.
Truth at the last--a case of obstructed death?R. Higgs - 1982 - Journal of Medical Ethics 8 (1):48-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
3 (#1,706,418)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references