Thinking Geometry: A Matter of Philosophy. The Case of Helmholtz and Poincaré

In Hassan Tahiri (ed.), Poincaré's Philosophy of Mathematics: Intuition Experience Creativity. pp. 107-121 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The controversy between Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometry arose new philosophical and scientific insights which were relevant to the later development of natural science. Here we want to consider Poincaré and Helmholtz’s positions as two of the most important and original ones who contributed to the subsequent development of the epistemology of natural sciences. Based in these conceptions, we will show that the role of philosophy is still important for some aspects of science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Poincaré on the Foundations of Arithmetic and Geometry. Part 2: Intuition and Unity in Mathematics.Katherine Dunlop - 2017 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7 (1):88-107.
Spatial Perception and Geometry in Kant and Helmholtz.Gary Hatfield - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:569 - 587.
Affine Geometry and Relativity.Božidar Jovanović - 2023 - Foundations of Physics 53 (3):1-29.
The theory‐ladenness of observations, the role of scientific instruments, and the Kantiana priori.Ragnar Fjelland - 1991 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (3):269 – 280.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-05

Downloads
5 (#1,560,632)

6 months
5 (#837,449)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

María de Paz
Universidad de Sevilla

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references