Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst (1997)

David A. Denby
Tufts University
Many theories assimilate the idioms of modality to those of quantification; they hold that so-and-so is possible iff there is a "world" at which it is true that so-and-so. "Modal realism" identifies worlds with certain concrete particulars, and truth at a world with what is true of it. Rival "ersatz" theories identify worlds with certain abstract entities and identify what is true at them with what they represent. ;David Lewis argues that pre-theoretic modal intuitions are best explained by modal realism. I try to make a case for ersatzism. ;First, I argue that modal realism is flawed on the grounds that it entails the impossibility of certain intuitively possible spatiotemporal structures; it fails to explain fully even those intuitions with which it is compatible; and it renders the origin of modal knowledge mysterious. ;Next, I argue that objections to ersatzism are not conclusive. ;Lewis objects that even a generic version of ersatzism requires an unnameable and maybe unintelligible primitive relation. I suggest that the problems with naming are perfectly general; they have nothing to do with metaphysical theories of modality in particular. And I suggest a solution taken from Lewis himself. I also argue that any purported unintelligibility is due to illegitimately assimilating the relation to spatiotemporal relations. ;Finally, I consider some difficulties with a version of ersatzism that aims to reduce modality to impure set-theory. One concerns the accommodation of intuitions about properties that are not, but might have been, instantiated. Another concerns accommodation of intuitions about relations of exclusion and entailment among properties. I suggest that these difficulties are due to faulty assumptions about the nature of properties rather than any fundamental flaws in this ersatz approach. So I propose an account of properties that when incorporated into ersatzism circumvents these difficulties and allows it to claim the advantages of modal realism without its drawbacks. Unlike traditional accounts, this takes the essence of a property to consist in its role in imposing a certain classificational structure on the particulars that instantiate it, rather than in any unique and irreducible "quiddity"
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Realism and Reason.Hilary Putnam - 1983 - Cambridge University Press.
Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic.David K. Lewis - 1968 - Journal of Philosophy 65 (5):113-126.
Causation.D. Lewis - 1973 - In Philosophical Papers Ii. Oxford University Press. pp. 159-213.
Realism and Reason.Hilary Putnam - 1977 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 50 (6):483-498.
Possible Worlds.Robert Stalnaker - 1976 - Noûs 10 (1):65-75.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Modal Primitivism.Jennifer Wang - 2013 - Dissertation, Rutgers University
Advanced Modalizing Problems.Mark Jago - 2016 - Mind 125 (499):627-642.
Something Less Than Paradise: The Magic of Modal Realism.Michael Hymers - 1991 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (3):251 – 263.
Necessity Naturalized: A Critique of Modal Realism.Andrew Scott Beedle - 1994 - Dissertation, The University of Connecticut
Overall Similarity, Natural Properties, and Paraphrases.Ghislain Guigon - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):387-399.
Actuality and the Amodal Perspective.Olla Solomyak - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (1):15-40.
Teorie metafizyczne światów niemożliwych [Metaphysics of Impossible Worlds].Sendłak Maciej - 2013 - The Metaphysics of Impossible Worlds The Article Outlines the Main Motivations for Postulating Impossible Worlds as Entities Which Are Required for Complete Analysis of Modality. It Also Presents Various Accounts of the Metaphysics of These Worlds. It Dis 8 (3).
The Accidental Properties of Numbers and Properties.Harold Noonan & Mark Jago - 2012 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):134-140.
Ridurre i mondi possibili al linguaggio.Vittorio Morato - 2006 - Annali Del Dipartimento di Filosofia 12:195-213.


Added to PP index

Total views
40 ( #285,701 of 2,519,639 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,756 of 2,519,639 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes