Learning & Labeling

Abstract

Clark and Karmiloff-Smith (CKS) have written an extraordinarily valuable paper, which sympathetically addresses what has all too often been an acrimonious and ideology-ridden "debate" and begins to transform it into a multi-perspective research program. By articulating the submerged hunches on both sides in a single framework, and adding some powerful new ideas of their own, they dispel much of the smoke of battle. What we can now see much more clearly is the need for a model of a brain/mind that, as they say, "enriches itself from within by re-representing the knowledge that it has already represented."

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Re-calling.Stephen David Ross - 2010 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:21-41.
Neuroeconomics: A critical reconsideration.Glenn W. Harrison - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (3):303-344.
Philosophy and the Humanities.Frederick A. Olafson - 1968 - The Monist 52 (1):28-45.
The Importance of Being Able.Ophelia Deroy - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):43-61.
Heraclitus: Fragment 98.Simon Tugwell - 1971 - Classical Quarterly 21 (1):32-32.
Does the Piano Play Itself?Michael Versteeg & Adam Barkman - 2018 - In James South & Kimberly Engels (eds.), Westworld and Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 90–101.
Wanted: a new way of thinking.Nicholas Maxwell - 1987 - New Scientist (14 May 1987):63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
3 (#1,729,579)

6 months
31 (#107,547)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel C. Dennett
Tufts University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references