The inclusion-exclusion principle for finitely many isolated sets

Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (2):435-447 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A nonnegative interger is called a number, a collection of numbers a set and a collection of sets a class. We write ε for the set of all numbers, o for the empty set, N(α) for the cardinality of $\alpha, \subset$ for inclusion and $\subset_+$ for proper inclusion. Let α, β 1 ,...,β k be subsets of some set ρ. Then α' stands for ρ-α and β 1 ⋯ β k for β 1 ∩ ⋯ ∩ β k . For subsets α 1 ,..., α r of ρ we write: $\alpha_\sigma - \{x \in v \ (\nabla i) \lbrack i \in \sigma \Rightarrow x \in \alpha_i\rbrack\} \text{for} \sigma \subset (1, \ldots, r),\\ s_i = \sum \{N(\alpha_\sigma) \mid \sigma \subset (1,\ldots, r) \& N(\sigma) = i\}, \text{for} 0 \leqq i \leqq r$ . Note that α 0 = v, hence s 0 = N(v). If the set v is finite, the classical inclusion-exclusion principle (abbreviated IEP) states $(a) N(\alpha_1 \cup \cdots \cup \alpha_r) = \sum^r_{t=1} (-1)^{t-1} s_t = \sum_{o \subset_+\sigma \subset (1,\ldots,r)}$ (b) N(α' 1 ⋯ α' r ) = ∑ r t=0 (-1) t s t = ∑ (-1) N(σ) N (α σ ). In this paper we generalize (a) and (b) to the case where α 1 ,⋯, α r are subsets of some countable but isolated set v. Then the role of the cardinality N(α) of the set α is played by the RET (recursive equivalence type) Req α of α. These generalization of (a) and (b) are proved in § 3. Since they involve recursive distinctness, this notion is discussed in § 2. In § 4l we consider a natural extension of "the sum of the elements of a finite set σ" to the case where σ is countable. § 5 deals with valuations, i.e., certain mappings μ from classes of isolated sets into the collection λ of all isols which permit us to further generalize IEP by substituting μ(α) for $\operatorname{Req} \alpha$

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Possible PCF algebras.Thomas Jech & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (1):313-317.
Σ1-separation.Fred G. Abramson - 1979 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 44 (3):374 - 382.
Iterated local reflection versus iterated consistency.Lev Beklemishev - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 75 (1-2):25-48.
On p-reducibility of numerations.A. N. Degtev - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 63 (1):57-60.
Reals n-Generic Relative to Some Perfect Tree.Bernard A. Anderson - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (2):401 - 411.
Isols and maximal intersecting classes.Jacob C. E. Dekker - 1993 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 39 (1):67-78.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
53 (#309,323)

6 months
18 (#152,517)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Myhill's work in recursion theory.J. C. E. Dekker & E. Ellentuck - 1992 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 56 (1-3):43-71.
Infinite series of regressive isols under addition.Judith L. Gersting - 1977 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 18 (2):299-304.

Add more references