Morphisms Between Aristotelian Diagrams

Logica Universalis:1-35 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In logical geometry, Aristotelian diagrams are studied in a precise and systematic way. Although there has recently been a good amount of progress in logical geometry, it is still unknown which underlying mathematical framework is best suited for formalizing the study of these diagrams. Hence, in this paper, the main aim is to formulate such a framework, using the powerful language of category theory. We build multiple categories, which all have Aristotelian diagrams as their objects, while having different kinds of morphisms between these diagrams. The categories developed here are assessed according to their ability to generalize previous work from logical geometry as well as their interesting category-theoretical properties. According to these evaluations, the most promising category has as its morphisms those functions on fragments that increase in informativity on both the opposition and implication relations. Focusing on this category can significantly increase the effectiveness of further research in logical geometry.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Metalogical Decorations of Logical Diagrams.Lorenz Demey & Hans Smessaert - 2016 - Logica Universalis 10 (2-3):233-292.
Logical Geometries and Information in the Square of Oppositions.Hans Smessaert & Lorenz Demey - 2014 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23 (4):527-565.
Schopenhauer’s Partition Diagrams and Logical Geometry.Jens Lemanski & Lorenz Demey - 2021 - In A. Basu, G. Stapleton, S. Linker, C. Legg, E. Manalo & P. Viana (eds.), Diagrams 2021: Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. 93413 Cham, Deutschland: pp. 149-165.
The Interaction between Logic and Geometry in Aristotelian Diagrams.Lorenz6 Demey & Hans5 Smessaert - 2016 - Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, Diagrams 9781:67 - 82.
Geometric and Cognitive Differences between Logical Diagrams for the Boolean Algebra B_4.Lorenz6 Demey & Hans5 Smessaert - 2018 - Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 83 (2):185-208.
Diagrams as sketches.Brice Halimi - 2012 - Synthese 186 (1):387-409.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-16

Downloads
11 (#1,167,245)

6 months
4 (#862,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Category Theory.S. Awodey - 2007 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 13 (3):371-372.
Logical Geometries and Information in the Square of Oppositions.Hans Smessaert & Lorenz Demey - 2014 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23 (4):527-565.
The Quantified Argument Calculus.Hanoch Ben-Yami - 2014 - Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):120-146.

View all 7 references / Add more references