Open Court Publishing (2003)

Leading art critic and philosopher Arthur Danto here explains how the anti-beauty revolution was hatched, and how the modernist avant-garde dislodged beauty from its throne. Danto argues not only that the modernists were right to deny that beauty is vital to art, but also that beauty is essential to human life and need not always be excluded from art.
Keywords Aesthetics   Art
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book $4.46 used (82% off)   $16.04 new (36% off)   $20.04 from Amazon (20% off)   Amazon page
ISBN(s) 0812695399 (alk. paper)   0812695402   9780812695403
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Concept of the Aesthetic.James Shelley - 2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Functional Beauty, Pleasure, and Experience.Panos Paris - 2020 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (3):516-530.
An Agon Aesthetics of Football.Steffen Borge - 2015 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 9 (2):97-123.
Coevolutionary Aesthetics in Human and Biotic Artworlds.Richard O. Prum - 2013 - Biology and Philosophy 28 (5):811-832.

View all 29 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
13 ( #768,750 of 2,505,137 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,909 of 2,505,137 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes