Lightness is not illuminant invariant: Reply to Troost and de Weert (1990)

Psychological Review 98 (1):146-148 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Color constancy: A case for multiple levels and paradigms.Michael H. Brill - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):658-658.
Lightness contrast and failures of lightness constancy-a common explanation.Al Gilchrist - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (5):349-349.
La leggerezza. Nietzsche e Calvino.Marta De Grandi - 2010 - Comunicazione Filosofica 24.
Invariant Logics.Marcus Kracht - 2002 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (1):29-50.
Judgments of surface illumination and lightness.Jacob Beck - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (5):368.
The influence of colour on subitation.M. J. H. Puts & C. M. M. de Weert - 1996 - In Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Perception. Ridgeview. pp. 103-103.
Apparent spatial position and the perception of lightness.Jacob Beck - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (2):170.
Ways of coloring the ecological approach.Johan Wagemans & Charles M. M. de Weert - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (1):54-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
4 (#1,624,035)

6 months
4 (#790,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references