Semel in Vita

Faith and Philosophy 24 (2):165-184 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his June 1643 letter to Princess Elizabeth, Descartes makes a claim that is a bit surprising given the hyper-intellectualism of the Meditations and other texts. He says that philosophy is something that we should do only rarely. Here I show how Descartes’ recommendation falls out of other components of his system—in particular his stoicism and his views on embodiment. A consequence of my reading is that to an important degree the reasoning of the Fourth Meditation is the imprecise reasoning of a not-yet-Cartesian meditator.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

4. Semel in vita: The Scientific Background to Descartes’ Meditations.Daniel Garber - 1986 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 81-116.
Argument and Persuasion in Descartes' Meditations.Tom Vinci - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):497-498.
Against the new Cartesian Circle.Everett Fulmer & C. P. Ragland - 2017 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (1):66-74.
The Analytic of Body in Descartes' "Meditations".David Richard Cunning - 2000 - Dissertation, University of California, Irvine
What’s Done, is Done.Kimberly Blessing - 2013 - Essays in Philosophy 14 (2):141-161.
Descartes' Analytic Epistemology.Alexis Newman - 1994 - Dissertation, University of California, Irvine

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
18 (#827,007)

6 months
9 (#437,668)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Cunning
University of Iowa

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Philosophy of Logical Atomism.Bertrand Russell - 1940 - Open Court. Edited by David Pears.
Descartes on the creation of the eternal truths.Harry Frankfurt - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (1):36-57.
Cartesian trialism.John Cottingham - 1985 - Mind 94 (374):218-230.
Stoic ethics.Malcolm Schofield - 2003 - In Brad Inwood (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 233--256.

View all 7 references / Add more references