What Systematicity Isn’t

Journal of Philosophical Research 30:405-408 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “On Begging the Systematicity Question,” Wayne Davis criticizes the suggestion of Cummins et al. that the alleged systematicity of thought is not as obvious as is sometimes supposed, and hence not reliable evidence for the language of thought hypothesis. We offer a brief reply.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On begging the systematicity question.Wayne A. Davis - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research 30:399-404.
On Begging the Systematicity Question.Wayne A. Davis - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research 30:399-404.
Systematicity redux.Brian P. McLaughlin - 2009 - Synthese 170 (2):251-274.
Meeting the Systematicity Challenge Challenge.Víctor M. Verdejo - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Research 37:155-183.
On the Systematicity of Language and Thought.Kent Johnson - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy 101 (3):111-139.
Explaining Systematicity.Kenneth Aizawa - 1997 - Mind and Language 12 (2):115-136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
92 (#190,821)

6 months
13 (#219,656)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Martin Roth
Drake University
James C. Blackmon
San Francisco State University
Robert Cummins
University of California, Davis

Citations of this work

Levels of Explanation Vindicated.Víctor M. Verdejo & Daniel Quesada - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (1):77-88.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references