NEH Panel: A Model for Philosophers

Abstract

Cross-disciplinary research (CDR) is an increasingly important part of the contemporary research 'landscape'. Despite its growing importance there remain a large number of barriers to successful CDR and many of these barriers are poorly understood. In particular there are challenges at the conceptual and communicative levels that have received relatively little attention. In this paper it is argued that these challenges are appropriate topics of analysis for philosophers. Appropriate methodologies for such an inquiry are considered and the case is made that agent based models (ABM’s) are an appropriate and under utilized resource. Current research using an ABM approach to philosophical issues in CDR is then described

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Contextualizing Science: From Science Studies to Cultural Studies.Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:402 - 412.
Philosophy and theological discourse.Stephen T. Davis (ed.) - 1997 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
The challenges of cross-disciplinary research.Jens Aagaard-Hansen - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (4):425 – 438.
Varieties of support and confirmation of climate models.Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 2009 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):213-232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-07-06

Downloads
13 (#1,022,934)

6 months
3 (#981,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Crowley
Boise State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references