What’s Within? Nativism Reconsidered

New York, US: Oxford University Press USA (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This powerfully iconoclastic book reconsiders the influential nativist position toward the mind. Nativists assert that some concepts, beliefs, or capacities are innate or inborn: "native" to the mind rather than acquired. Fiona Cowie argues that this view is mistaken, demonstrating that nativism is an unstable amalgam of two quite different--and probably inconsistent--theses about the mind. Unlike empiricists, who postulate domain-neutral learning strategies, nativists insist that some learning tasks require special kinds of skills, and that these skills are hard-wired into our brains at birth. This "faculties hypothesis" finds its modern expression in the views of Noam Chomsky. Cowie, marshaling recent empirical evidence from developmental psychology, psycholinguistics, computer science, and linguistics, provides a crisp and timely critique of Chomsky's nativism and defends in its place a moderately nativist approach to language acquisition. Also in contrast to empiricists, who view the mind as simply another natural phenomenon susceptible of scientific explanation, nativists suspect that the mental is inelectably mysterious. Cowie addresses this second strand in nativist thought, taking on the view articulated by Jerry Fodor and other nativists that learning, particularly concept acquisition, is a fundamentally inexplicable process. Cowie challenges this explanatory pessimism, and argues convincingly that concept acquisition is psychologically explicable. What's Within? is a clear and provocative achievement in the study of the human mind.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In defense of nativism.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):693-718.
Innate Ideas.Fiona Cowie - 1994 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Cowie’s Anti‐Nativism.Robert J. Matthews - 2001 - Mind and Language 16 (2):215-230.
Mad dog nativism.Fiona Cowie - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (2):227-252.
On Cussing in Church: In Defence of What’s Within?Fiona Cowie - 2001 - Mind and Language 16 (2):231-245.
What's within. Nativism reconsidered.Raffaella De Rosa - 2002 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (1):119 – 122.
The return of the nativist.M. J. Cain - 2004 - Philosophical Explorations 7 (1):1-20.
Cowie on the poverty of stimulus.John Collins - 2003 - Synthese 136 (2):159-190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
204 (#90,312)

6 months
6 (#202,901)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fiona Cowie
Last affiliation: California Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

The language of thought hypothesis.Murat Aydede - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Innateness and the sciences.Matteo Mameli & Patrick Bateson - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (2):155-188.
Nativism in cognitive science.Richard Samuels - 2002 - Mind and Language 17 (3):233-65.

View all 75 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references