Time as Relative

Philosophy 90 (3):369-391 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophical development of Leibniz's view that time is merely earlier–later order is necessary because neither Leibniz nor modern followers sufficiently answered the Newtonian charge that order does not give quantity. Logically, order is transitive, quantity, as in distance, is not. Quantity, as well as order, is naturally assumed in Newton's absolute time, so that to declare the mere relative order sufficient is to have to show how quantity can arise for it. The modern theory of the continuum, perfectly applicable to Newton's absolute, does not show this but assumes quantity. The development given here shows how interval, instant and simultaneity can be logically developed from Leibniz's insight.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Time-Relative Interests and Abortion.S. Liao - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):242-256.
Self Visitation, Traveler Time, and Compatible Properties.John W. Carroll - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):359-370.
Why Does Time Pass?Bradford Skow - 2011 - Noûs 46 (2):223-242.
History and the Concept of Relative Time.W. Leyden - 1963 - History and Theory 2 (3):263-285.
God and Time: Relative Timelessness Reconsidered.Alan Padgett - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 884--892.
Newton's views on space, time, and motion.Robert Rynasiewicz - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-01

Downloads
22 (#695,360)

6 months
2 (#1,229,212)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?