Gender and Evidence in Family Law Reform: A Case Study of Quantification and Anecdote in Framing and Legitimising the ‘Problems’ with Child Support in Australia

Feminist Legal Studies 24 (2):147-167 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Despite claims of ‘evidence based policy’, the place of empirical evidence in family law reform is ambiguous. There is ongoing socio-legal analysis of the differential value and uses of quantitative data and anecdote in detailing women’s experiences and advocating for change. In this paper, we engage with these issues through a focus on how data were constructed in a key government report, Every Picture Tells a Story, which was used to officially define the problem and outline recommendations in the controversial 2006-08 reform of the Australian Child Support Scheme. Our discussion focuses on two questions: what legitimacy is accorded to different kinds of evidence in family law reform processes?; and, how is this legitimacy gendered? We applied feminist critical discourse analysis to the type, source and claims of the data included in the child support chapter of the report. Our findings indicate that both quantitative data and anecdote were used to privilege fathers’ financial interests and autonomy; in contrast, women’s voices and interests were marginalised. Thus, we argue the legitimacy of data is ascribed through its relationship to the gendered definition of the ‘problems’ of child support, rather than the type of data per se.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,916

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Queering the Odds: The Case Against "Family Balancing".Tereza Hendl - 2017 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 10 (2):4-30.
Family Law Reform in Australia, or Frozen Chooks Revisited Again?Reg Graycar - 2012 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 13 (1):241-269.
Mere anecdote: evidence and stories in medicine.Robin Nunn - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):920-926.
Ten Days in Brisbane.Gary MacLennan - 2017 - Journal of Critical Realism 16 (1):4-6.
The favoured child?D. Jones, D. Dickenson & J. Devereux - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (2):108-111.


Added to PP

1 (#1,513,615)

6 months
1 (#485,121)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On Being Uncomfortable.Ruth Fletcher, Julie McCandless, Yvette Russell & Dania Thomas - 2016 - Feminist Legal Studies 24 (2):121-126.
Judging in Marriage’s Shadow.Robert Leckey - 2018 - Feminist Legal Studies 26 (1):25-45.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Family Law Reform in Australia, or Frozen Chooks Revisited Again?Reg Graycar - 2012 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 13 (1):241-269.

Add more references