Things dreamt: a response to Berislav Marusic

Philosophical Studies 179 (8):2419-2427 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Skeptical arguments from dreaming deny that we can know that we are awake. This denial lacks initial credibility to many of us. Often it seems easy to know. A brief reflection seems sufficient. How might the reflection enable us to know? Berislav Marusic offers a plausible answer. The answer is that we can take note of certain phenomenal qualities that are present only when we are awake. The present work argues that there are no such qualities. The final section gives a different account of the knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-12

Downloads
29 (#569,467)

6 months
8 (#415,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Earl Conee
University of Rochester

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Asymmetry arguments.Berislav Marušić - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (4):1081-1102.

Add more references