Handbook for the Historiography of Science

Springer (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book aims to perform a critical and broad assessment of the historiography of science produced from the late nineteenth century to the early twenty-first century. It presents its main authors, concepts, ideas, conceptions, and schools. It also analyzes the historical circumstances of the rise of the discipline history of science and the relations of the historiography of science with related areas. These chapters do not understand the historiography of science as a mere description or record of the history of science. Instead, they understand the historiography of science from the epistemological criteria and choices that guided the writing of the history of science in its different contexts. In other words, more than describing the record of the various possibilities of historiographical approaches to science, the chapters carry out an epistemological reflection to assess the bases, possibilities, scope, and limits of different historiographical conceptions, authors, and traditions that have established the writing of the history of science. This book can be conceived as a reference work not only for professional historians and philosophers but also for academics from different backgrounds who are initiating themselves in the universe of history and philosophy of science, be they scientists from different fields or young researchers from different backgrounds who want to start studying the history and philosophy of science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,707

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Historiography of Science as a Specific Field of Research.Mauro L. Condé & Marlon Salomon - 2018 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 4:1.
Historiography of Science: The Link between History and Philosophy in Understanding Science.L. Condé Mauro & Salomon Marlon - 2017 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science, 2.
Interview: Joseph Agassi.Agassi Joseph, L. Condé Mauro, Pisano Raffaele & Segre Michael - 2016 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 1.
Kuhn and the genesis of the “new historiography of science”.J. C. Pinto de Oliveira - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):115-121.
In Defense of Causal Presentism.Veli Virmajoki - 2022 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 12 (1):68-96.
Science and its Historicity. [REVIEW]Eduardo Salles de O. Barra - 2018 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 4:190.
Duhem’s Legacy for the Change in the Historiography of Science: An Analysis Based on Kuhn’s Writings.Oliveira Amélia - 2017 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 2:127.
Historiography and the Study of Rhetoric".Arthiur E. Walzer & David E. Beard - 2009 - In A. Lunsford, K. Wilson & R. Eberly (eds.), Sage Handbook of Rhetorical Studies. Sage Publications. pp. 13.
What happened to the historiography of science?Renan Springer De Freitas - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (1):92-106.
When Historiography Met Epistemology.Stoffel Jean-François - 2017 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 2:163-165.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-01

Downloads
14 (#1,011,984)

6 months
8 (#407,549)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references