Trigeminal and Olfactory Chemosensory Impact of Selected Terpenes

Abstract

COMETTO-MUÑIZ, J. E., W. S. CAIN, M. H. ABRAHAM AND R. KUMARSINGH. Trigeminal and olfactory chemosensory impact of selected terpenes. PHARMACOL BIOCHEM BEHAV. In Experiment 1, four normosmics and four anosmics provided odor and nasal pungency thresholds, respectively, for the following terpenes: ∆3-carene, p-cymene, linalool, 1,8-cineole, and geraniol, plus the structurally-related compound cumene. Additionally, all subjects provided nasal localization and eye irritation thresholds. Trigeminally-mediated thresholds lay about three orders of magnitude above odor thresholds — which ranged between 0.1 and 1.7 ppm. The results implied uniform chemesthetic sensitivity across tasks and sites of impact. In Experiment 2, normosmics and anosmics provided odor and nasal pungency thresholds, respectively, for three pairs of isomeric terpenes: a- and g-terpinene, a- and ß-pinene, and R- and S-limonene. Odor thresholds ranged between 1.4 and 19 ppm — that is, about an order of magnitude higher than those of the previous terpenes — with no substantial differences between odor thresholds of members of a pair. Regarding chemesthetic impact, only a-terpinene evoked nasal pungency. The overall outcome suggests comparable trigeminal chemosensitivity between nose and eyes and between normosmics and anosmics, as shown before for homologous n-alcohols. It also lends support to a previously-derived solvation model of the chemesthetic potency of airborne substances, and indicates the likely importance of certain molecular-size restrictions for effective trigeminal impact.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Detecting olfactory rivalry.Richard J. Stevenson & Mehmet K. Mahmut - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (2):504-516.
A method for the determination of olfactory thresholds in humans.R. H. Gundlach & G. Kenway - 1939 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 24 (2):192.
An investigation of the "randomness" of threshold measurements.Michael Wertheimer - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (5):294.
An experimental and statistical study of olfactory preferences.M. D. Eysenck - 1944 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 34 (3):246.
The difference between monaural and binaural thresholds.W. A. Shaw, E. B. Newman & I. J. Hirsh - 1947 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 37 (3):229.
Smelling matter.Benjamin D. Young - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (4):1-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-29

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references