- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Resource-rationality as a normative standard of human rationality
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43 (2020)
Abstract
Lieder and Griffiths introduce resource-rational analysis as a methodological device for the empirical study of the mind. But they also suggest resource-rationality serves as a normative standard to reassess the limits and scope of human rationality. Although the methodological status of resource-rational analysis is convincing, its normative status is not.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
On is an ought: Levels of analysis and the descriptive versus normative analysis of human reasoning.Walter Schroyens - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):101-102.
Does rational analysis stand up to rational analysis?Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):88-89.
Two cheers for bounded rationality.Raanan Lipshitz - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):756-757.
Resource‐rational Models of Human Goal Pursuit.Ben Prystawski, Florian Mohnert, Mateo Tošić & Falk Lieder - 2022 - Topics in Cognitive Science 14 (3):528-549.
Rationality and the Social Sciences.James H. Moor - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:3 - 11.
Normative ecological rationality: normative rationality in the fast-and-frugal-heuristics research program.D. Wade Hands - 2014 - Journal of Economic Methodology 21 (4):396-410.
Resource-rational analysis: understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources.Falk Lieder & Thomas L. Griffiths - forthcoming - Behavioral and Brain Sciences:1-85.
Can resources save rationality? ‘Anti-Bayesian’ updating in cognition and perception.Eric Mandelbaum, Isabel Won, Steven Gross & Chaz Firestone - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 143:e16.
On the meaning and function of normative analysis: Conceptual blur in the rationality debate?David R. Mandel - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):686-687.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-03-04
Downloads
33 (#471,918)
6 months
20 (#173,532)
2021-03-04
Downloads
33 (#471,918)
6 months
20 (#173,532)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Bayesian Cognitive Science, Unification, and Explanation.Stephan Hartmann & Matteo Colombo - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (2).
Bayesian Cognitive Science, Monopoly, and Neglected Frameworks.Matteo Colombo & Stephan Hartmann - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (2):451–484.
Normative theories of rational choice: expected utility.Rachael Briggs - 2017 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Arguments For—Or Against—Probabilism?Alan Hájek - 2009 - In Franz Huber & Christoph Schmidt-Petri (eds.), Degrees of belief. London: Springer. pp. 229--251.
Suboptimality in perceptual decision making.Dobromir Rahnev & Rachel N. Denison - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41:1-107.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-7g5mb uwo