Lead into gold: the science of finding nothing

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (4):661-691 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Scientists are always doing experiments or making observations that disappoint them. Most negative experiments are consigned to the file drawer. But in physics, lead is regularly transmuted into gold by treating a negative result as an upper limit—an observation of the maximum strength of the phenomenon under investigation. The logic and sociology of upper limits and the logic and sociology of positive results are different. I explore the difference through a case study in the physical sciences. In the conclusion I ask why social sciences only rarely translate their negative findings into successes.Author Keywords: Physics; Gravitational Waves; Negative Results; Upper Limits; Audiences for Science

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lead into gold: The science of finding nothing.M. H. - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (4):661-691.
Gold’s Theorem and Cognitive Science.Kent Johnson - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (4):571-592.
On the distinction between the concept of God and conceptions of God.Eberhard Herrmann - 2008 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (2):63 - 73.
Understanding the “Social License to Operate”.William P. Smith - 2010 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 21:223-230.
Learning Simple Things: A Connectionist Learning Problem from Various Perspectives.Edward P. Stabler - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:424 - 441.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
15 (#929,240)

6 months
4 (#793,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?