Religious Studies 22 (2):277-280 (1986)

Peter Geach supports his case that the religion of Thomas Hobbes was both genuine and a version of Socinianism principally by comparing the theological and scriptural sections of Leviathan with the main doctrines of Socinianism and its latter-day developments in Unitarianism and Christadelphianism. He pays particular attention to comparisons with the Racovian Catechism, the theological writings of Joseph Priestley and the Christadelphian document Christendom Astray by Robert Roberts
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412500018266
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Knowledge of God in Leviathan.Stewart Duncan - 2005 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 22 (1):31-48.
Leibniz on Hobbes’s Materialism.Stewart Duncan - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):11-18.
Hobbes and 'The Beautiful Axiom'.C. A. J. Coady - 1990 - Philosophy 65 (251):5 - 17.
Hobbes.Aloysius Martinich - 1989 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (1):636-637.


Added to PP index

Total views
35 ( #325,233 of 2,506,885 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,885 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes