Le libéralisme de Marx

Actuel Marx 56 (2):109-123 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article re-examines Marx’s liberal period as a contributor to and later as a member of the editorial board of the Rhenish Gazette and the question of the consequences of his liberalism on his transition to socialism. Far from claiming straight away to be the most politically radical of the young Hegelians, the young Marx outlined in his 1842-43 articles a version of moderate republicanism, close to that of Carl von Rotteck. It was by following the gradual distancing of the young Hegelians from liberalism and their concomitant radicalisation, that Marx successively adopted democratic and then socialist positions. This political and theoretical evolution is nonetheless predicated upon the anti-liberal elaboration of what had been a liberal problematic, formulated from 1842 : the question of the autonomy of society relative to the State. It was by way of the critical comprehension of the implications of this demand that Marx gradually arrives at the critique of the constitutional State as an abstract political sphere, and to the defense of a social self-organization for which the requisite is the prior transformation of the activity in question.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Liberalism, reason(ableness) and the politicization of truth: Marx’s critique and the ironies of Marxism.Terrell Carver - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (2):115-129.
The Young Hegelians and Karl Marx. [REVIEW]J. B. R. - 1969 - Review of Metaphysics 23 (1):135-135.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-02

Downloads
24 (#644,067)

6 months
10 (#384,490)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What Is Worth Salvaging in Modernity.Katerina Kolozova - 2022 - In Jeffrey R. Di Leo & Zahi Anbra Zalloua (eds.), Understanding Barthes, understanding modernism. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 183-195.
Le Manuscrit de Kreuznach et l’ambiguïté de la démocratie sociale.Pauline Clochec - 2017 - Les Cahiers Philosophiques de Strasbourg 41:77-97.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references