Reply to Burgess and to Read

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (2):195-200 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Editorial Thanks to Burgess.[author unknown] - 1994 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (1):159-159.
Burgess on relevance: a fallacy indeed.Stephen Read - 1983 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (4):473-481.
Trees and finite satisfiability: proof of a conjecture of Burgess.George Boolos - 1984 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 25 (3):193-197.
Read on relevance: a rejoinder.John P. Burgess - 1984 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 25 (3):217-223.
A Remark on Negation in Dependence Logic.Juha Kontinen & Jouko Väänänen - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (1):55-65.
Arithmetic Starred.Chris Mortensen - 2013 - In Francesco Berto, Edwin Mares, Koji Tanaka & Francesco Paoli (eds.), Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer. pp. 309--314.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
27 (#142,020)

6 months
9 (#1,260,759)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chris Mortensen
University of Adelaide

Citations of this work

A plea for KR.Alison Duncan Kerr - 2019 - Synthese 198 (4):3047-3071.
Logical pluralism and semantic information.Patrick Allo - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (6):659 - 694.
Idealist Origins: 1920s and Before.Martin Davies & Stein Helgeby - 2014 - In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 15-54.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references